FACULTY OF CULTURE AND SOCIETY | Seminar
Bidzina Lebanidze: The EU-Russia Competition
Tuesday 18 November, 15:15 - 17:00
Hybrid meeting, join on Zoom
NI:C0933, 9th floor seminar room, Niagara or Zoom
Bidzina Lebanidze: "The EU-Russia Competition: Multi-Modal Contestation and Governance in a Shared Sphere of Influence"
Welcome to RUCARR seminar 18th November!
Speaker:
Dr. Bidzina Lebanidze, PhD, Senior Analyst at the Georgian Institute of Politics (GIP) and a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Institute of Slavic Languages and Caucasus Studies at Friedrich Schiller University Jena. He obtained his doctorate in Political Science from the Free University of Berlin, and his Master’s degree in International Relations from Tbilisi State University. Previously, he also held various teaching and research positions at the University of Bremen, the University of Freiburg, Berlin School for Economics and Law, Free University of Berlin and Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
In an era of resurgent multipolar competition, a fundamental update to our understanding of the reemerging concept of Spheres of Influence (SOIs) is needed. This analysis introduces the "Multi-Modal Sphere of Influence" (MMSOI) as a new analytical framework, positing that contemporary great powers project influence not just via coercion, but through a dynamic interplay of five modalities: military, economic, institutional, normative, and digital.
This framework is used to deconstruct the intractable EU-Russia conflict in their "shared neighborhood" by bridging macro-, meso-, and case-level findings. At the macro-level, the core of the conflict is defined by different modalities of competition; this is not a symmetrical power struggle, but a structural clash between incompatible toolkits: the EU’s dominant normative, institutional, and economic modalities colliding with Russia’s reliance on its coercive-military and energy-based toolkit.
This overlapping, multi-modal contestation creates, at the meso-level, a paradoxical environment for "in-between" states, granting them new avenues for hedging and agency while simultaneously exposing them to acute risks of coercion and conflict. Finally, the analysis unpacks the EU’s paradoxical role as an "antithetical actor." While normatively rejecting SOIs, the EU's institutional and regulatory expansion functions as a powerful, sui generis SOI-building tool, making it an unintentional geopolitical player. This synthesized approach explains the EU-Russia competition not merely as a regional dispute, but as a microcosm of 21st-century multi-modal, multipolar contestation.
