Design för omställning

- Agnafors, Marcus & Levinsson, Magnus (2019). Att tänka uppsats: det vetenskapliga arbetets grundstruktur. Malmö: Gleerups.
- Jonstad, David (2012). Kollaps: livet vid civilisationens slut. Stockholm: Ordfront.
-  Manzini, Ezio (2015). Design, when everybody designs: an introduction to design for social innovation. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
- Thackara, John (2015). How to thrive in the next economy: designing tomorrow's world today. London: Thames and Hudson

Övrig litteratur i urval: 

- Buchanan, Richard (1992). ”Wicked Problems in Design Thinking”. Design Issues, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. ([http://web.mit.edu/jrankin/www/engin\_as\_lib\_art/Design\_thinking.pdf]())
- Buwert, Peter (2015). ”An/Aesth/Ethics: the ethical potential of design”. Artifact, 3(3). doi:10.14434/artifact.v3i3.3960/art.3.3.4.1\_1. ([https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/artifact/article/view/3960/26342]())
- Ehn, Pelle, Nilsson, Elisabet M. & Topgaard, Richard (red.) (2014). Making futures: marginal notes on innovation, design, and democracy. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.(Prolog hämtas från: [https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/making-futures]()).
- Hagbert, Pernilla, Wangel, Josefin., & Broms, Loove. 1977. (2020). “Exploring the Potential for Just Urban Transformations in Light of Eco-Modernist Imaginaries of Sustainability”. Urban Planning, 5(4), 204–216. [https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i4.3302]().
- Illich, Ivan (1973). Tools for conviviality. London. ([http://www.mom.arq.ufmg.br/mom/arq\_interface/3a\_aula/illich\_tools\_for\_conviviality.pdf]())
- Irwin, Terry, Kossoff, Gideon & Tonkinwise, Cameron (2015). Transition Design Provocation, Design Philosophy Papers, 13:1, 3-11, doi: 10.1080/14487136.2015.1085688. ([http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14487136.2015.1085688]())
- Khan, Jamil, Hildingsson, Roger and Garting, Lisa (2020). “Sustainable welfare in Swedish cities : Challenges of eco-social integration in urban sustainability governance”, Sustainability (Switzerland) BECC: Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in a Changing Climate, 12(1), pp. 1–17. doi:10.3390/su12010383.
- Kostakis, V., Roos, A. and Bauwens, M. (2016) “Towards a political ecology of the digital economy: Socio-environmental implications of two competing value models”, Environmental Innovation & Societal Transitions, 18, pp. 82–100. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.08.002. ([http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210422415300150]())
- Markussen, Thomas (2013) “The Disruptive Aesthetics of Design Activism: Enacting Design Between Art and Politics”, Design Issues, 29(1), pp. 38–50. The MIT Press. ([http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/DESI\_a\_00195]())
- Parker, Peter and Schmidt, Staffan (2017). “Enabling urban commons”, CoDesign - International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 13(3), pp. 202–213. doi:10.1080/15710882.2017.1355000.
- Thorpe, Ann (2008). Design för hållbar utveckling: ekologi, ekonomi, kultur. Stockholm: Raster.
- Winner, Langdon (1980). “Do Artifacts Have Politics?”, Daedalus, 109(1), pp. 121–136.
- Wolfram, Marc and Kienesberger, Miriam (2023). “Gender in sustainability transition studies: Concepts, blind spots and future orientations”, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 46. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2022.100686.
- WWF (2017). ”WWF Earth Hour. Tillsammans för klimatet” (Bilen, Biffen, Bostaden, Börsen, Butiken). [http://www.wwf.se/wwfs-arbete/klimat/earth-hour/1415461-earth-hour]()